首页> 外文OA文献 >Fulfilling the electricity demand of electric vehicles in the long term future: An evaluation of centralized and decentralized power supply systems
【2h】

Fulfilling the electricity demand of electric vehicles in the long term future: An evaluation of centralized and decentralized power supply systems

机译:在长期未来实现电动汽车的电力需求:对集中式和分散式电源系统的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electric vehicles (EVs) are currently seen as an option for a more sustainable transportation sector, but it is not yet clear how to supply them with electricity whilst striving for low costs and low CO2 emissions. Renewable sources can supply electricity with low emissions, but their penetration rate is still insufficient to meet current demand, let alone the extra demand of EVs. A promising option is supply by Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plants with high combined efficiencies, but an in-depth evaluation of the benefits of combining of EVs and CHP plants is still missing. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of four different types of CHP plants to power electric vehicles, as compared to use of electricity from the grid. The performance of CHP plants is simulated using detailed datasets of the composition of a future power system, the demand for household electricity and heat, and technical specifications of CHP plants and electric vehicles. We find that the lowest abatement costs of 60–190 €/tCO2 are achieved with grid electricity based on a low-carbon electricity mix compared to a business-as-usual electricity mix with marginal emissions of 450–500 gCO2/kW h. When electricity is supplied by CHP plants, emissions are −1000 to 400 gCO2/kW h, and abatement costs are 165–940 €/tCO2. We did not observe added benefits of joint implementation of CHP plants and EVs: the timing of CHP electricity supply and EV electricity demand did not match well, and abatement costs were not lowered.
机译:电动汽车(EV)目前被视为交通运输业更具可持续性的一种选择,但是目前尚不清楚如何在为电动汽车提供电力的同时努力实现低成本和低CO2排放。可再生能源可以提供低排放的电力,但其普及率仍不足以满足当前需求,更不用说电动汽车的额外需求了。具有较高综合效率的热电联产(CHP)电厂提供了一个有前途的选择,但仍缺少对电动汽车和CHP电厂合并的好处的深入评估。因此,与电网使用电力相比,本研究评估了四种不同类型的热电联产电厂为电动汽车提供动力的性能。热电联产电厂的性能是使用详细的数据集模拟的,该数据集包括未来电力系统的组成,对家庭用电和热的需求以及热电联产电厂和电动汽车的技术规格。我们发现,与低排放450-500 gCO2 / kW h的常规电力混合相比,基于低碳电力混合的电网电力可实现60-190€/ tCO2的最低减排成本。当热电联产厂提供电力时,排放量为-1000至400 gCO2 / kW·h,减排成本为165–940€/ tCO2。我们没有观察到联合实施热电联产工厂和电动汽车的额外好处:热电联产电力供应和电动汽车电力需求的时间安排不匹配,减排成本也没有降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号